Hi Felix, Thanks for working on the action item. I guess I am lacking some knowledge to understand http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#directionality-definition I wonder for example whether [dir="ltr"] { unicode-bidi: embed; direction: ltr} is valid CSS. Wrt. http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3466 I have to admit they I have lost track of the relationship between Ruby and ITS which is currently supported by the spec. Regards, Christian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Felix Sasaki Gesendet: Sunday, September 24, 2006 3:39 AM An: public-i18n-its@w3.org Betreff: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 Hi all, I implemented issue 3466, which includes: - action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 Felix to draft a text for the CSS issue. See http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#directionality-definition for the text. - action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 Felix to implement http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3466. This encompasses a subsection 3.5 on "Usage of Internationalized Resource Identifiers in ITS", the delition of conformance clause 2-2 for ruby / directionality , and the change of references (Ruby and directionality are only non-normative referenced now). Cheers, FelixReceived on Monday, 25 September 2006 10:38:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:48 GMT