RE: Question about reference to OpenDocument

Hi Felix,
 
>> Was there a reason to have this in the specification? Why talking 
>> about OpenDocument? Not XHTML?, not other formats?
>
> XHTML cite the W3C Ruby TR, so no need to refer to XHTML here. 
> I'm not aware of other standardized formats than the ruby TR and ODF, and I think it is worth mentioning both of them.

OK.


>> why saying this
>> for Ruby and not for Directionality, for for Translate and DITA?
>
> We can do that, do you want to?

No, otherwise we may have to mention 'translatable' in Glade, etc. We can't really list all the formats that have corresponding ITS
markup. I guess that was my point: what made OpenDocument so special it has its own little note? :)

But I'm fine with what's there. No need to change anything.

-yves