- Re: Comments on issue 101 Doug Davis (Wednesday, 31 October)
- RE: Comments on issue 101 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Wednesday, 31 October)
- RE: Comments on issue 101 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Wednesday, 31 October)
- RE: Comments on issue 101 Doug Davis (Wednesday, 31 October)
- RE: Comments on issue 101 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Wednesday, 31 October)
- RE: Comments on issue 101 Doug Davis (Wednesday, 31 October)
- RE: Comments on issue 101 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Wednesday, 31 October)
- Re: Comments on issue 101 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Wednesday, 31 October)
- RE: Comments on issue 101 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Wednesday, 31 October)
- RE: Comments on issue 101 Doug Davis (Wednesday, 31 October)
- Re: Comments on issue 101 Doug Davis (Wednesday, 31 October)
Re: [SOAP Encoding Issue] Most to least specific encodingStyles, HOW? Rich Salz (Tuesday, 30 October)
- RE: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Williams, Stuart (Friday, 19 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Friday, 19 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Kumeda (Monday, 22 October)
- RE: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Williams, Stuart (Monday, 22 October)
- RE: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Williams, Stuart (Monday, 22 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Kumeda (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Kumeda (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Kumeda (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Kumeda (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Kumeda (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Doug Davis (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Thursday, 25 October)
- RE: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Mountain, Highland M (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Kumeda (Friday, 26 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Friday, 26 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Friday, 26 October)
- RE: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns Joseph Hui (Friday, 26 October)
Usage Scenarios John Ibbotson (Friday, 19 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework, HTTP Binding, MEP documents Paul Denning (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: SOAP Binding Framework, HTTP Binding, MEP documents Glyn Normington (Tuesday, 16 October)
- RE: SOAP Binding Framework, HTTP Binding, MEP documents Williams, Stuart (Friday, 19 October)
- RE: SOAP Binding Framework, HTTP Binding, MEP documents Williams, Stuart (Friday, 19 October)
- RE: SOAP Binding Framework, HTTP Binding, MEP documents Glyn Normington (Friday, 19 October)
- RE: SOAP Binding Framework, HTTP Binding, MEP documents Williams, Stuart (Friday, 19 October)
Usage Scenarios John Ibbotson (Wednesday, 10 October)
- RE: Possibility of an XML Document Type Corda, Ugo (Thursday, 4 October)
- RE: Possibility of an XML Document Type Corda, Ugo (Thursday, 4 October)
- RE: Possibility of an XML Document Type Corda, Ugo (Friday, 5 October)
- RE: Possibility of an XML Document Type Mike Dierken (Friday, 5 October)
- RE: Possibility of an XML Document Type John J. Barton (Friday, 5 October)
- RE: Possibility of an XML Document Type Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: Possibility of an XML Document Type Mullins, Chalon (Wednesday, 10 October)
- RE: Possibility of an XML Document Type Andrew Layman (Wednesday, 10 October)
Issue 140 bogus? Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: Issue 140 bogus? christopher ferris (Tuesday, 2 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Mike Dierken (Tuesday, 2 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Williams, Stuart (Tuesday, 2 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Williams, Stuart (Wednesday, 3 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Williams, Stuart (Wednesday, 3 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Williams, Stuart (Wednesday, 3 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Williams, Stuart (Wednesday, 3 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Thursday, 4 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Williams, Stuart (Thursday, 4 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Thursday, 4 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Thursday, 4 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Friday, 5 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Friday, 5 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Williams, Stuart (Monday, 8 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Wednesday, 10 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Doug Davis (Wednesday, 10 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Williams, Stuart (Wednesday, 10 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Williams, Stuart (Wednesday, 10 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Doug Davis (Wednesday, 10 October)
- RE: Issue 140 bogus? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Wednesday, 10 October)
Last message date: Wednesday, 31 October 2001 21:55:52 UTC