- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:20:55 -0400
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
* David Orchard <david.orchard@bea.com> [2001-10-05 17:16-0700] > I took Noah's excellent wording[1] and semantically NOTed it. My attempt > follows. Please note that this wording defines that relative URI's ARE > interpreted according to xml:base, therefore implementations must support > xml:base. It seems to me that an application that doesn't support xml:base > but supports relative URIs is an undefined state. > > BASE URI's and Relative URI Resolution > -------------------------------------- [..] > Namespace declarations for the namespaces used in this specification (such > as http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope) MUST be provided as absolute > URI's. Element or attribute names qualified with relative URI namespaces > are not recognized as matching the absolute names mandated by this > specification." I think that we should add "as per the recommendation of the W3C XML Plenary", and add an informative link to [2]. 2. http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xppa -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2001 14:21:01 UTC