- From: Kumeda <kumeda@atc.yamatake.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:30:50 +0900
- To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- CC: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'marwan sabbouh'" <ms@mitre.org>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Hello Marc,
Thank you very much for sending comments to my post.
> PMFJI, but I'm a bit confused about the problem here. What's to stop me
> writing a binding spec that provides e.g. reliable request-response over
> an unreliable one way transport like UDP ? I.e. where the "binding layer
> provides certain functionality" like correlating requests and responses
> and adding reliability.
>
The point of discussion is, whether or not we need the binding "layer" which
provides certain set of functionality like request-response paring. In my
opinion before my post, and confirmed after reading the XMLP abstract model
document, the mapping "layer" provides just "mapping" as described in 5.1.4 of
the document. I believe required functionality should be performed within SOAP
or at the boundary of SOAP applications.
Best regards,
Yasuo
--
Kumeda, Yasuo TEL: +81-466-20-2430
FAX: +81-466-20-2431
Research and Development Headquarters
Yamatake Corporation
Fujisawashi Kawana 1-12-2
Kanagawa, 251-8522 JAPAN
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2001 04:40:31 UTC