Re: ETF: Issue 48 Discussion

Rich Salz wrote:
> I hope it will be written such that you can't claim "soap+encoding"
> conformance if your encoding is wrong.
>
That is the intent, yes.

>  Something like "Implementations
> MAY choose to support the SOAP encoding rules, as specified in section
> xxx. If they do so, and claim conformance, then they MUST implement it
> according to the text of that section."
> 	/r$
> 

Marc.

-- 
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.

Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 10:37:00 UTC