Re: FW: Proposed positive text for XML Base

Actually, since we'll now be based on the infoset, namespaces are 
correctly applied to each element "automatically".  Of course, how a 
particular implementation does this is not our business, and you may build 
a system that in fact just gives you the "<..>".  Still, in principle at 
the SOAP level, each element and attribute information item has a [namespace name] property [1].

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/#infoitem.element

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                                    Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp.                            Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------------







Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
10/19/01 12:42 PM

 
        To:     christopher ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
        cc:     Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org, (bcc: Noah 
Mendelsohn/CAM/Lotus)
        Subject:        Re: FW: Proposed positive text for XML Base


> If you simply picked up the angle-brackets and handed them
> to the application, that would indeed be the case barring
> some normalization of the various referencve URIs.

And xmlns prefixes, and xml:space, etc.

Hmm..  it sure looks like enough things bleed through from the wrapper
SOAP XML elements that you can't just "lift out" the payload.

Anyone disagree? 
-- 
Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity
Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption
http://www.zolera.com

Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 15:36:46 UTC