- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 16:09:50 +0200 (CEST)
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Hi all. 8-) I've this issue with the current specification of the SOAP Encoding: it does not define strictly the mapping of the encoding to XML Schema. This has caused, for example, a very weird way of specifying the array information attributes in WSDL [1]: <complexType name="ArrayOfFloat"> <complexContent> <restriction base="soapenc:Array"> <attribute ref="soapenc:arrayType" wsdl:arrayType="xsd:float[]"/> </restriction> </complexContent> </complexType> I think that specifying an array's type should be possible without resorting to extensions from a different namespace, but even if this is necessary, in my opinion the namespace should be soap-encoding, not of the particular language that needs to say "the message contains an array of floats". So I think we should add some wording to say how exactly types are described in XML Schema and what to do with schemas that don't map back to our encoding (for example complex types containing application-defined attributes.) Jacek Kopecky Idoox http://www.idoox.com/
Received on Monday, 15 October 2001 10:09:53 UTC