- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:45:03 -0500
- To: Oisin Hurley <ohurley@iona.com>
- CC: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>, Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
I don't see XMI as being multiple encodings. What I meant was use of mixed encodings (a little bit of this, a smattering of that...) Oisin Hurley wrote: >>+1 to KISS. Has anyone a demonstrable need for support >>for multiple encodings? >> > > Yep - I see a requirement for XMI encoding. There's > a lot of encouraging work going on in the area of model-driven > architecture and XMI is an important way to represent > metadata. Since XMI has recently been updated to use XML > schema, it now is much more effectively aligned with > the popular use of WSDL for service definition and by > extension, transmission in SOAP messages. > > > cheers > --oh > > >
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 09:49:22 UTC