Re: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) from Bob Hutchison on 2001-10-02 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from October 2001)

From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 20:37:51 -0400
To: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>, <francis@redrice.com>
CC: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>, xml dist <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B7DE849E.7AD%hutch@xampl.com>

You'd think I'd be careful with the word 'it' since it's what got me
involved here in the first place :-)

I understand your paragraph, and I'm wondering similar things to what you
wrote. What I don't understand is why this decision was made. Perhaps
someone can explain why the a SOAP receiver isn't using some kind of
pre-parsed information.

On 01/10/01 8:26 PM, "Bob Hutchison" <hutch@xampl.com> wrote:
> I'll let others respond to your last paragraph, because I don't understand
> it. The only comment I'll make now is that, in my opinion, this is a much
> more significant issue than 'issue 4'.

Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 20:38:22 UTC