- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:15:16 -0700
- To: "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I don't think we can drop the notion that an intermediary is both a sender and a receiver: "A SOAP intermediary is both a SOAP sender and a SOAP receiver, target-able from with a SOAP message..." The important thing about an intermediary is that it acts on behalf of another SOAP node. I think that is stated slightly implicit in terms of initial sender and ultimate recipient but can live with it. >"A SOAP intermediary is a SOAP receiver, target-able from with >a SOAP message, that is neither the intial SOAP sender nor the >ultimate receiver of that message. It processes a SOAP message >according to the SOAP processing model. A consequence of >processing is that the SOAP message is sent further along the >SOAP message path to the next SOAP node." Henrik
Received on Monday, 15 October 2001 13:15:49 UTC