- From: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:09:19 -0400
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Issue Part 2, section 4.1 'Rules for Encoding Types in XML' [1], rule 8 says that each array member element is encoded as an independent element. In the previous terminology section item 11, spec says that an independent element is any element appearing at the top level of a serialization and all others are embedded elements. This is a disconnect. 'Cos, examples in section 4.4.2 'Arrays' use embedded elements to represent array members. Regardless, what is the rational for encoding array members as independent elements? I don't see any rational for encoding array members as independent elements and propose a simple solution - 'array member element is encoded as an embedded element'. Or, if this rule is intentional then I suggest that we fix all the examples to reflect it. Comments? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-soap12-part2-20011002/#encrules [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-soap12-part2-20011002/#arrays Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu webMethods, Inc. 703-460-2513 or asirv@webmethods.com http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Friday, 12 October 2001 10:04:47 UTC