- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 15:09:59 -0400
- To: francis@redrice.com
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> But I'd like to suggest that we can satisfy both requirements more > simply by standardizing on the XPath 1.0 data model. In other words we > specify that ... You seem to be missing the point that SOAP is also a wire protocol. It is not sufficient to define a data model, but also to define what the bits (bytes) on the wire must look like. If you mandate either one in isolation, you can end up making it very difficult to make strictly conforming implementations. E.g., if you say "Xpath data model" and I'm building on top of a DOM, it can be hard for me to outlaw CDATA. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption http://www.zolera.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2001 15:08:58 UTC