www-ws-desc@w3.org from February 2004 by date

Monday, 1 March 2004

• New Issue: wsdl location and service reference Jeff Mischkinsky

Saturday, 28 February 2004

• Re: Validation, Versioning and RDF [Was Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1] Bijan Parsia
• Re: Correction for the f2f Minutes (Also action 2004-01-30 for Jonathan) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Correction for the f2f Minutes (Also action 2004-01-30 for Jonathan) Jonathan Marsh
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG David Orchard

Friday, 27 February 2004

• Validation, Versioning and RDF [Was Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1] David Booth
• Re: Marking operations safe Hugo Haas
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Jonathan Marsh
• [revised] Agenda: 4-5 March 2004 WS Description WG FTF Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Marking operations safe Michael Champion
• Re: Marking operations safe Paul Denning
• Marking operations safe Hugo Haas
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations Martin Gudgin
• question about interface/operation/@style and interface/@styleDefault Sanjiva Weerawarana

Thursday, 26 February 2004

• Minutes, 26 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Endpoints and QNames Ugo Corda
• RE: Comments on WebArch Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature David Booth
• Re: Comments on WebArch David Booth
• Re: Comments on WebArch David Booth
• Re: Comments on WebArch David Booth
• Re: Comments on WebArch David Booth
• WSDL Language versus processor David Booth
• Re: Proposed resolution to issue 143 Bijan Parsia
• RE: Proposed resolution to issue 143 Martin Gudgin
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Mark Baker
• Re: Proposed resolution to issue 143 Bijan Parsia
• Proposed resolution to issue 143 Martin Gudgin
• RE: Dublin Core for Version metadata paul.downey@bt.com
• Dublin Core for Version metadata Bijan Parsia
• Re: Correction for the f2f Minutes (Also action 2004-01-30 for Jonathan) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Mark Baker
• Correction for the f2f Minutes (Also action 2004-01-30 for Jonathan) Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Wednesday, 25 February 2004

• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG Matthew Fuchs
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Vambenepe, William N
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG Jonathan Marsh
• [draft] Agenda: 4-5 March 2004 WS Description WG FTF Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Mark Baker
• [rev] Agenda, 26 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes: 19 February 2004 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels
• RE: Comments on WebArch paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Comments on WebArch Mark Baker
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 24 February 2004

• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels
• Re: Comments on WebArch Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Comments on WebArch Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 23 February 2004

• Re: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG Jim Murphy

Tuesday, 24 February 2004

• Re: Comments on WebArch Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Comments on WebArch Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Comments on WebArch Mark Baker
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL David Orchard
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Prasad Yendluri

Monday, 23 February 2004

• Agenda, 26 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Comments on WebArch Jonathan Marsh
• Re: A scenario investigating questions of conformance and scoping Amelia A Lewis
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels
• RE: Comments on WebArch David Orchard
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jim Webber
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jim Webber
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jonathan Marsh
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Amelia A Lewis
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Bijan Parsia
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jonathan Marsh
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• Comments on WebArch Jonathan Marsh
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Mark Baker
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Vambenepe, William N
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Savas Parastatidis
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jonathan Marsh
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Amelia A Lewis
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Amelia A Lewis
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Amelia A Lewis
• RE: operation name in responses? Glen Daniels
• RE: operation name in responses? Jacek Kopecky
• RE: operation name in responses? Glen Daniels
• operation name in responses? Jacek Kopecky
• My review of AWWW Jacek Kopecky
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jim Webber
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Mark Baker
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jim Webber

Sunday, 22 February 2004

• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Mark Baker
• Re: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG Glen Daniels
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Glen Daniels

Saturday, 21 February 2004

• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jim Webber
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Jonathan Marsh
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG Matthew Fuchs

Friday, 20 February 2004

• 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG David Orchard
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Prasad Yendluri
• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations Arthur Ryman
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Bijan Parsia
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Vambenepe, William N
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG Matthew Fuchs

Thursday, 19 February 2004

• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL David Orchard
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Vambenepe, William N
• Re: Message Reference, Message|element encore Mark Baker
• Re: Message attribute optional Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Message attribute optional Tom Jordahl
• Re: Message Reference, Message|element encore FABLET Youenn
• Re: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? Mark Baker
• RE: Message Reference, Message|element encore paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Message Reference, Message|element encore FABLET Youenn
• re: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG David RR Webber - XML ebusiness

Wednesday, 18 February 2004

• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations Martin Gudgin
• [rev 1] Agenda, 19 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? David Orchard
• WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG David Orchard
• Re: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? Arthur Ryman
• Re: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: A scenario investigating questions of conformance and scoping Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? Arthur Ryman
• Handling Privacy In WSDL 2.0 Hugo Haas
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations Arthur Ryman
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Message attribute optional Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Confusion between binding and element names Jacek Kopecky
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations Martin Gudgin
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? Martin Gudgin
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations Martin Gudgin
• Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: The semantics of mandatory properties and features Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations Jacek Kopecky
• Re: The semantics of mandatory properties and features Jacek Kopecky
• WI/IAT'04 On-Line Submission is open WI/IAT'04 (IEEE/WIC/ACM)
• Operation names and self-description Mark Baker
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL David Orchard
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Prasad Yendluri

Tuesday, 17 February 2004

• RE: Version attribute for WSDL David Orchard
• RE: Agenda, 19 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• SOAP Data Model Schema Language (first public proposal) Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Tom Jordahl
• Re: Agenda, 19 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana

Monday, 16 February 2004

• Agenda, 19 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Should WSDL say anything about whitespace in SOAP:Body? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Should WSDL say anything about whitespace in SOAP:Body? Sanjiva Weerawarana

Sunday, 15 February 2004

• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 Mark Baker
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 Mark Baker
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 Bijan Parsia
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 Bijan Parsia
• RE: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 David Orchard
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 Mark Baker
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 Bijan Parsia

Saturday, 14 February 2004

• Should WSDL say anything about whitespace in SOAP:Body? Jacek Kopecky
• Versioning scenarios and compatibility assurances David Orchard
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 Mark Baker

Friday, 13 February 2004

• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Vambenepe, William N
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL David Orchard
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Jeff Mischkinsky
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Vambenepe, William N
• Minutes, 12 Feb 2004 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL David Orchard
• WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 David Orchard
• Post-Doc positions available at INRIA Sophia Antipolis Fabien Gandon
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Vambenepe, William N
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL David Orchard
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Tom Jordahl
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Jeff Mischkinsky
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Jeff Mischkinsky
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Mark Baker

Thursday, 12 February 2004

• RE: Version attribute for WSDL David Orchard
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Glen Daniels
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Tom Jordahl
• Minutes, 22 January 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL David Orchard
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Tom Jordahl
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Vambenepe, William N
• Re: Message Reference, Message|element encore Bijan Parsia
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL Tom Jordahl
• Out Of Body Experiences (application header feature) Glen Daniels
• RE: Agenda, 12 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL Amelia A Lewis
• Version attribute for WSDL Tom Jordahl
• Re: Agenda, 12 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Umit Yalcinalp
• Issue 109: Versioning David Orchard

Wednesday, 11 February 2004

• Message Reference, Message|element encore Bijan Parsia
• RE: [wsdl] WSDL v2.0 Schema Error Martin Gudgin
• Fwd: [wsdl] WSDL v2.0 Schema Error Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: ISSUE : Properties should not be limited to simple types Jean-Jacques Moreau

Tuesday, 10 February 2004

• Issue #136 Amelia A Lewis

Monday, 9 February 2004

• Agenda, 12 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Declaring and Using Media Types and Pointer to Task Force Mailing List Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issues list and edtodo updated Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 6 February 2004

• Invitation for paper submission rdc@mitre.org

Thursday, 5 February 2004

• Invitation for a Discussion on Headers Yaron Goland
• Re: ISSUE : Properties should not be limited to simple types Umit Yalcinalp
• Minutes of WS Desc teleconference 2004-02-05 David Booth
• ISSUE : Properties should not be limited to simple types Glen Daniels
• RE: tinyurl considered harmful David Booth
• Issues list and edtodo updated Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Agenda, 5 February 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: tinyurl considered harmful Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Declaring and Using Media Types and Pointer to Task Force Mailing List Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: tinyurl considered harmful Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Second level xs:import Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Second level xs:import Martin Gudgin
• RE: Second level xs:import Yaron Goland
• Re: Second level xs:import Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Second level xs:import Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Declaring and Using Media Types and Pointer to Task Force Mailing List Umit Yalcinalp

Wednesday, 4 February 2004

• Re: Second level xs:import Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Second level xs:import Yaron Goland
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed Prasad Yendluri
• Re: tinyurl considered harmful Mark Baker
• tinyurl considered harmful Mark Baker
• Summary: 28-30 Jan 2004 WS Description FTF Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes: 29 Jan 2004 WS Description FTF Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes: 30 Jan 2004 WS Description FTF Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes: 28 Jan 2004 WS Description FTF Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Second level xs:import Amelia A Lewis
• Re: updates to edtodo? Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Second level xs:import Martin Gudgin
• Re: Second level xs:import Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Second level xs:import Anne Thomas Manes
• Headers as first class citizens Yaron Goland

Tuesday, 3 February 2004

• RE: Second level xs:import Yaron Goland
• RE: updates to edtodo? Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 2 February 2004

• Re: updates to edtodo? Roberto Chinnici
• updates to edtodo? Sanjiva Weerawarana

Last message date: Sunday, 29 February 2004 20:53:22 UTC