RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature

Hi Jim:

> > OK, let's start this way.  Why do we bother with 
> <operation> at all in 
> > WSDL?
> 
> If you remember a while back, Savas and I tried to get it 
> changed to something more meaningful like "messageExchange." 
> 
> All operation really defines is the structure of 
> incoming/outgoing messages for a specific interaction.
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Exactly.  See the other msgs in this thread for my take on
why it's important to have SOME way of recognizing which 
interaction is in play.

--Glen

Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 16:57:40 UTC