RE: tinyurl considered harmful from Jonathan Marsh on 2004-02-05 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:51:40 -0800
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA2027F1450@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Yes, I will do that.  The use of tinyurl for the issues list started
when the url pointed directly into CVS and was too big for one line.
It's not necessary any more.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Mark Baker
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:20 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: tinyurl considered harmful
> 
> 
> Ah, I just noticed that tinyurl only seems to be used for the issues
> list, which is great.  I recommend replacing the tinyurl with the
> biguglyurl.
> 
> Mark.
>

Received on Thursday, 5 February 2004 10:51:54 UTC