Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature

Glen Daniels wrote:

>Hi Savas, all:
>
>  
>
>>>"message exchange pattern" is a much better term than 
>>>      
>>>
>>"operation", but 
>>    
>>
>>>we *don't* want to end up in another argument about naming, 
>>>      
>>>
>>please the 
>>    
>>
>>>gods of small forest pools and sandy ocean beaches.
>>>      
>>>
>>In fact, if people in this mailing list (that's the ws-desc 
>>one) remember, Jim and I proposed the renaming of 
>>/interface/operation to /interface/messageExchange and during 
>>the discussion more terms were mentioned... 
>>/interactions/messageExchange or /interactions/exchange (was 
>>it issue #88?).
>>    
>>
>
>Yep, and Sanjiva suggested renaming this to "interaction" as well (which
>I liked).
>
>  
>
>>I think the above much better captures the role of WSDL (at 
>>least as the way Jim and I see it... and I guess Amy). We are 
>>talking about a description of the message exchange patterns 
>>and the formats of those messages. We are not describing 
>>interfaces. Many toolkits have been treating WSDL as an IDL 
>>for objects and that complete misses the point of Web 
>>Services and as all of us know, Web Services != Distributed 
>>objects :-)) (yes, that one again! :-)
>>    
>>
>
>If you can't distinguish between message exchanges / interactions /
>operations, then what good are they?  See my recent message to Amy [1].
>
And also [2].

>
>The fact that "interfaces" happen to combine "operations", and that you
>COULD if you wanted to then map those "interfaces" to things that look
>like objects/classes, is, while true, orthogonal to the desire to
>utilize and identify the operations themselves.
>
>--Glen
>
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/0176.html
>
>
>  
>
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/0181.html

-- 
Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
ORACLE
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          
Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com

Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 16:52:13 UTC