W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

Re: Version attribute for WSDL

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:08:42 -0500
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040225150842.Y25269@www.markbaker.ca>

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:48:18AM -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> David's point about not actually munging the namespace URI is important
> - the actual namespace URI may not be under the control of the author of
> the WSDL.

Whoa, I didn't realize that's what we were discussing.  So you're saying
that if I define a namespace;


and others want to create a revision of that, that they're
going to mint markbaker.ca URIs like this;


If so, yuck, get your hands off my URIs[1]! 8-) That seems to be exactly
what you're trying not to do when you wrote this (which I agree with

> We don't want to introduce a spec that forces
> namespace URIs to be constructed in a way that violates the conventions
> a domain owner may have in effect.

If you want to do this in a more Web-friendly manner, I'd suggest
treating the URIs as opaque and using the information returned from
invoking GET on a URI to declare what other namespace it might be a
revision of.  For example, if this were a revision URI;


then a GET might return some RDF/RDDL with some embedded RDF which says;

<Namespace rdf:about="http://joeschmoe.example.org/ns/2/3/1/4/">
  <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.markbaker.ca/my-service/namespace/"/>

I *think* rdfs:subClassOf is the semantics you want, but if not, just
define your own property, e.g. wsdl:revisionOf, or some such.

 [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSpaceSquatting

Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 15:07:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:38 UTC