W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature

From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:35:47 -0000
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA801CD24C@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


We will be chastised for bringnig this up again, but:

> Well, there is an operation, because the message is requesting that
> *something* be done, no?  Not including it in the message 
> just makes the message less self-descriptive than the 
> alternative of putting the operation name in it.  I like 
> self-descriptiveness, so I want to see it there.

No, the message is just flowing to an endpoint. What happens to it there
is out of scope. All WSDL does is tell you what the message must look

Received on Sunday, 22 February 2004 19:36:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:38 UTC