RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature from Jim Webber on 2004-02-21 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 05:55:21 -0000
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "Umit Yalcinalp" <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>, "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA801CD21F@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>

> I'm not sure whether having the Operation Name in the message 
> is always necessary

+1 to that. To paraphrase a regularly paraphrased phrase: "The first
thing you have to learn is that there is no operation."

Jim

Received on Saturday, 21 February 2004 00:56:30 UTC