W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

Re: The semantics of mandatory properties and features

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:44:01 +0100
Message-ID: <40337A31.5030907@crf.canon.fr>
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>
Cc: ygoland@bea.com, WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Yes, this is the natural implication.


Jacek Kopecky wrote:

> I don't think the semantics of required features is not just that a WSDL
> processor must understand it, but also that every binding and endpoint
> must fulfill the feature, right?
> Jacek
> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 15:48, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:
>>Yes, I believe it was intent. It looks like we need to fix the spec.
>>Yaron Goland wrote:
>>>Does the required attribute defined in sections and have the
>>>same semantics as the wsdl:required attribute defined in section
>>>6.1.1/6.1.2? In other words, if a property or feature is marked with
>>>required="true" and the WSDL engine doesn't recognize the marked property or
>>>feature then must the WSDL engine fault? If so, shouldn't this be explicitly
>>>pointed out in the spec?
>>>	Thanks,
>>>		Yaron
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 09:45:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:38 UTC