- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:44:01 +0100
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>
- Cc: ygoland@bea.com, WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Yes, this is the natural implication. JJ. Jacek Kopecky wrote: > I don't think the semantics of required features is not just that a WSDL > processor must understand it, but also that every binding and endpoint > must fulfill the feature, right? > > Jacek > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 15:48, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote: > >>Yes, I believe it was intent. It looks like we need to fix the spec. >> >>Jean-Jacques; >> >>Yaron Goland wrote: >> >> >>>Does the required attribute defined in sections 2.6.2.2 and 2.7.2.2 have the >>>same semantics as the wsdl:required attribute defined in section >>>6.1.1/6.1.2? In other words, if a property or feature is marked with >>>required="true" and the WSDL engine doesn't recognize the marked property or >>>feature then must the WSDL engine fault? If so, shouldn't this be explicitly >>>pointed out in the spec? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Yaron >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 09:45:16 UTC