- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:48:57 -0500
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Cc: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>
+1. There is no conflict. The WSDL processor doesn't need verify portions of the WSD that it doesn't need. If the portion of the WSD that is in error is not needed (according to the WSDL spec) for the task at hand, and the processor doesn't see the error, and hence there is no error from which to recover. On the other hand, if the processor DOES depend on something that is in error, then it would be bad to silently recover. In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/0201.html Jacek wrote: >JMarsh wrote: > > 1.2.3: "Principle: Error recovery. Silent recovery from error is > > harmful." > > > > Could this conflict with the ability to only use a part of a document > > that does not contain errors, without flagging errors in other parts of > > the document? > >We don't say that when a processor encounters an error, it may try to >recover silently. What we say is a processor may not traverse some parts >of a document and therefore not detect any errors in it. No conflict. -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 11:49:06 UTC