- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:27:12 -0500
- To: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Hi Jim: >> But as I think I must have said before, you seem to be trying >> to make WSDL be something that it isn't. That may or may not >> be a good thing to do, but every use of WSDL I've seen uses >> it describe application interfaces, so that's where my >> comments are coming from. > > I'm not trying to make WSDL anything else, it already is a message > description langauge. Some people like to think that it describes this > mythical application, but I see no justifcation for that. The > "application" that receives a message described in WSDL might be a > human reading a fax. How does that tie in with an operation? OK, let's start this way. Why do we bother with <operation> at all in WSDL? --Glen
Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 09:36:18 UTC