Re: Confusion between binding and element names

+1, my reason being that I dislike different semantics for elements with
the same qnames.

Jacek

On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:08, Yaron Goland wrote:
> Some of the children of the interface and binding XML elements, specifically
> the XML elements operation, input, output, infault and outfault, use the
> same names but have different, although related, meanings in the two
> locations.
> 
> It would be friendlier to those writing WSDLs, especially to those talking
> about WSDLs, if slightly different names were used.
> 
> For example, one can imagine that the names for the children of interface
> would stay the same but the children of binding would change to
> bindOperation, bindInput, bindOutput, bindInFault, bindOutFault and
> bindMessageReference.
> 
> This small change would make simple sentences such as "The second infault
> has an error" much clearer as one would know that an interface was being
> discussed.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 
> 		Yaron
>

Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 10:09:37 UTC