Re: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? from Mark Baker on 2004-02-19 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:01:23 -0500
To: paul.downey@bt.com
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040219090123.R15631@www.markbaker.ca>

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:49:18PM -0000, paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
> 
> +1 
> 
> i think this sounds simple to specify and can immediately think of quite a few existing generic services which present such an interface but don't readily fall into the 'intermediary' bucket: dead-letter queues, message archivers, audit trails, etc.

... resources.

P.S. +1

Mark.

Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 09:00:52 UTC