RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature from Jim Webber on 2004-02-23 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:42:05 -0000
To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA801CD364@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>

Hey Glen:

> OK, let's start this way.  Why do we bother with <operation> 
> at all in WSDL?

If you remember a while back, Savas and I tried to get it changed to
something more meaningful like "messageExchange." 

All operation really defines is the structure of incoming/outgoing
messages for a specific interaction.

Jim

Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 16:43:08 UTC