- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:27:01 -0500
- To: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Feb 23, 2004, at 2:54 PM, Umit Yalcinalp wrote: [snip] > Given an interface there may be more than one exchange that uses the > same message structure. When an endpoint receive a message, it is NOT > obvious which message exchange it belongs to since the current WSDL > design does not convey an identifier of the exchange in the exchange > itself. Just trying to understand....Is this what you mean? I have operation Foo and Bar and they both have the same initial in message (same type, etc.)? All the subsequent messages might be distinguished by whatever correlation mechanism one has. Or do you mean that two message exchanges with the same pattern and same types for all the messages (and the same endpoint/binding/whatever) should nevertheless be distinguishable (by "operation")? The former seems quite plausible. The latter seems to require actually distinguishing the messages :) Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 15:27:11 UTC