www-tag@w3.org from February 2002 by date

Thursday, 28 February 2002

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Jonathan Borden
• Re: Interpretation of XML documents with mixed namespaces [mixedNamespaceMeaning-13] Jonathan Borden
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Mark Nottingham
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF Elliotte Rusty Harold
• updated xmlns media feature Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Bray
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Bray
• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? Patrick Stickler
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF Patrick Stickler
• RE: Minutes from 4 Feb 2002 TAG teleconference Fisher Mark
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 George Lund
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF Tim Berners-Lee
• Interpretation of XML documents with mixed namespaces [mixedNamespaceMeaning-13] Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Simon St.Laurent

Wednesday, 27 February 2002

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist Jonathan Borden
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? Mark Baker
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? Tim Bray
• Re: Namespace dispatching Tim Bray

Tuesday, 26 February 2002

• Re: Intepretation: whenToUseGet-7 Tim Berners-Lee

Monday, 25 February 2002

• Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) Paul Prescod
• RE: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) Micah Dubinko
• QUERY (was re: PROPFIND) Paul Prescod
• Re: PROPFIND disconnected from GET space? [whenToUseGet-7] Mark Baker
• Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be enco uraged...) Paul Prescod

Sunday, 24 February 2002

• Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be enco uraged...) Chris Lilley
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Piotr Kaminski
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Elliotte Rusty Harold

Saturday, 23 February 2002

• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Piotr Kaminski
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Eric van der Vlist
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Paul Prescod
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Piotr Kaminski
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Eric van der Vlist

Friday, 22 February 2002

• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Eric van der Vlist
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 21 February 2002

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist Jonathan Borden
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist Tim Bray
• Re: Namespace dispatching Paul Grosso
• RE: Namespace dispatching Paul Grosso
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist Patrick Stickler
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist Jonathan Borden
• [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist Jonathan Borden
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Re: Namespace dispatching Patrick Stickler
• Re: Namespace dispatching Patrick Stickler
• RE: Namespace dispatching Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Namespace dispatching Micah Dubinko
• [namespaceDocument-8] Re: Namespace dispatching Jonathan Borden
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns Ian Graham
• Re: Namespace dispatching Paul Prescod
• Re: Namespace dispatching Paul Prescod
• Re: Namespace dispatching Paul Prescod

Wednesday, 20 February 2002

• RE: Namespace dispatching Jacek Kopecky
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Jonathan Borden
• Re: Namespace dispatching Jonathan Borden
• RE: Namespace dispatching Julian Reschke
• Re: Namespace dispatching Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Namespace dispatching Patrick Stickler
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns ned.freed@mrochek.com
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns ned.freed@mrochek.com
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns John Cowan
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns Mark Nottingham
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns Mark Nottingham
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 19 February 2002

• Re: "canonical" URIs Joseph Reagle
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Mark Nottingham
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Namespace dispatching Simon St.Laurent
• Intepretation: whenToUseGet-7 Paul Prescod
• Namespace dispatching Paul Prescod
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Paul Prescod
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Graham Klyne
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Graham Klyne
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Graham Klyne
• New question: distinguished status of http:? Graham Klyne
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 David Orchard
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Bray
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Bray
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Bray
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Bray
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Simon St.Laurent
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Dan Connolly

Monday, 18 February 2002

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Paul Prescod

Tuesday, 19 February 2002

• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Simon St.Laurent

Monday, 18 February 2002

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Dan Connolly
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 David Orchard
• [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 Tim Bray
• Re: Possible Architectural issue with XHTML modularization? Jonathan Borden
• [uriMediaType-9]: Draft Finding from 12th February F2F Meeting Williams, Stuart
• Root Namespaces, 'document types' and XPaths Jonathan Borden
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs Patrick Stickler
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Crossposting: was Namespace and URIs Ian B. Jacobs
• [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses Patrick Stickler
• Re: Possible Architectural issue with XHTML modularization? Masayasu Ishikawa
• Possible Architectural issue with XHTML modularization? Tim Bray
• [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses Tim Bray
• Crossposting: was Namespace and URIs Tim Bray
• PROPFIND disconnected from GET space? [whenToUseGet-7] Dan Connolly
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs Jonathan Borden
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs Paul Prescod
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs John Cowan

Sunday, 17 February 2002

• Namespace and URIs Paul Prescod

Saturday, 16 February 2002

• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment Jun Fujisawa
• Request for Guidance on XML Encryption changing MedaTypes Joseph Reagle

Friday, 15 February 2002

• Issue for the tag? Brian McBride

Thursday, 14 February 2002

• Re: customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? Tim Bray
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Norman Walsh
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Rick Jelliffe
• Issue for the TAG Daniel Dardailler
• Re: customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? MURATA Makoto
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment MURATA Makoto

Wednesday, 13 February 2002

• RE: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure Paul Cotton
• Re: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure Eric van der Vlist
• RE: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure Paul Cotton
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Paul Prescod
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Jacek Kopecky
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Norman Walsh
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Jacek Kopecky
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Norman Walsh
• Re: New Issue request for TAG: Where does XML fit into the Web Architecture Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Jacek Kopecky
• Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure Eric van der Vlist
• Draft TAG response to as yet unnumbered Rick Jelliffe issue David Orchard
• Re: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs Paul Prescod
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Martin Duerst

Tuesday, 12 February 2002

• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Simon St.Laurent
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Dan Connolly
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Norman Walsh
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Paul Prescod
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Simon St.Laurent
• PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs David Fallside
• [uriMediaType-9] Re: Minutes from 4 Feb 2002 TAG teleconference Graham Klyne
• New Issue request for TAG: Where does XML fit into the Web Architecture Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs Mark Baker
• RE: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs Paul Cotton

Monday, 11 February 2002

• Re: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs Paul Prescod
• Minutes from 4 Feb 2002 TAG teleconference Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Eastlake on Mime/URI Mark Nottingham
• Re: Eastlake on Mime/URI Paul Prescod
• Eastlake on Mime/URI Tim Bray

Saturday, 9 February 2002

• [uriMediaType-9] Identifying Content Classes in HTTP Using rdf:type Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs Paul Cotton
• Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs Paul Prescod

Friday, 8 February 2002

• RE: Request for Architects [slightly off topic] Paul Cotton
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment Piotr Kaminski

Thursday, 7 February 2002

• Re: customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? Simon St.Laurent
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment Tim Bray
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment Tim Bray
• RE: XML-SW, a thought experiment Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Packaging (was namespaces and MIME types) Paul Prescod
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment Jacek Kopecky
• RE: XML-SW, a thought experiment David Orchard
• XML-SW, a thought experiment Tim Bray

Wednesday, 6 February 2002

• Re: Packaging (was namespaces and MIME types) Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Slight architectural discrepancy between XMl 1.0 & the infoset Norman Walsh
• Packaging (was namespaces and MIME types) Norman Walsh
• Re: Namespaces are Simply Punctuation Patrick Stickler
• Re: Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) Jason Diamond
• RE: Namespaces are Simply Punctuation Larry Masinter
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) Patrick Stickler
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) Patrick Stickler
• Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 5 February 2002

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like? Tim Bray
• [uriMediaType-9] Why does the Web use mime types and not URIs? Ian B. Jacobs
• [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like? Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc Paul Prescod
• customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? Tim Bray

Monday, 4 February 2002

• RE: Issue request for the TAG: XForms Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• Re: "charset" is not generic to all media types [nsMediaType-3] Graham Klyne
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc Tim Bray
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc Mark Baker
• "charset" is not generic to all media types [nsMediaType-3] Dan Connolly
• RE: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases Bill de hÓra
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc Paul Prescod
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc Mark Baker
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc Paul Prescod
• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases Paul Prescod

Saturday, 2 February 2002

• Re: Slight architectural discrepancy between XMl 1.0 & the infoset Dan Connolly

Friday, 1 February 2002

• Slight architectural discrepancy between XMl 1.0 & the infoset Tim Bray

Saturday, 2 February 2002

• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc Tim Berners-Lee

Friday, 1 February 2002

• Re: Resource discovery: limits of URIs Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases MURATA Makoto

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2002 17:53:05 UTC