- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:17:41 +0200
- To: ext Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- CC: XML DEV <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, WWW TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2002-02-18 1:09, "ext Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net> wrote: > The RDDL view is that they DO have identity, meaning and structure and > can thus have schemas and stylesheets associated with them. Well, it's one thing to say tht they have meaning or structure and can have resources associated with them, but it's another thing to equate them to specific vocabularies, document models, schemas, etc. which in all fairness are individual resources in their own right independent from any namespace. > If namespaces are NOT things with identity and internal structure (i.e. > they are just punctuation) then we should never have used URIs to refer > to them. Not necessarily. It's useful for namespaces to be mnemmonic. It's useful for namespaces to inherit the global uniqueness characteristics of URIs. I have no problems with using URIs to denote namespaces, only with URLs being used for namespaces ;-) Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 09:16:15 UTC