- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@attbi.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:43:05 -0500 (EST)
- To: "TAG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Tim Bray wrote: [[ I just looked at the XHTML modularization rec, and it doesn't seem to say much about namespaces, except that if you put in new stuff, it has to be in a non-XHTML namespace - perfectly sensible. But the top-level namespace is still that of XHTML I gather? Modularization is signaled using the public identifier in the DOCTYPE declaration; see section 3.6 of http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/conformance.html I'm not sure what I think, but it does feel relevant to our recent discussions. -Tim ]] Yes it does. More reason why the top level _set_ of namespace declarations, alternatively a particular XPath pattern, are better indications of how a document is intended to be processed than the root element _qualifying_ namespace alone. Jonathan
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 11:02:12 UTC