- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:37:03 -0500
- To: "'www-tag'" <www-tag@w3.org>
At 5:21 PM -0800 2/23/02, Piotr Kaminski wrote: >My point: you can't have it both ways. Either PIs are out-of-band, and >not part of the main document's schema (what the original proponents >wanted, I believe), or they are validated by the schema, in which case we >might as well use normal elements. My point is that you most certainly can have it both ways. Most schema languages do not validate processing instructions. Other hypothetical schema languages may choose to do so. Currently Schematron is the only one I know of that could plausibly do this, if the schema author chose. (Schematron is liberal: everything not forbidden is permitted. If you don't specifically exclude PIs, then they're allowed.) You can use N schemas written in M languages if it seems useful to do so. Some of these may ignore PIs. Some may validate PIs. Some may only validate PIs. There's an extreme Aristotelian tendency in the XML world that tries to lock everything down and insist that there's only one way to do it, that all documents must adhere to a schema, that there can be only one schema per document, and even that there can be only one schema language. The assumption is that validity is a boolean, i.e. either true or false, and that a document cannot be both valid and invalid at the same time; and furthermore that invalid documents are incorrect. In practice, though, that's not what XML is about. X stands for Extensible. Decisions about whether and which schemas to use for what purposes are completely up to the local processing environment. Choose the schemas that seem useful to you. In choosing schema A in language, you in no way rule out either yourself or myself using schema B in language Y. And these different schemas may not be at all equivalent. They may not come to the same conclusions about document validity, and they may not assign the same types to the same elements. XMl is not Aristotelian. It's fuzzy, and that's part of its power and its usefulness. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Saturday, 23 February 2002 22:41:12 UTC