- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 19:46:06 -0500 (EST)
- To: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- CC: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, XML DEV <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
Paul Prescod scripsit: > One view or the other needs to be standardized. To my mind, the upshot of the xml-uri debate was that namespaces have a string property called "namespace name" which has the syntax of a non-relative URI reference. I'll repeat that. Namespaces have a *string* property called "namespace name" which has the *syntax* of a non-relative URI reference. Namespaces are equal if their namespace names are string-equal. It is an open question whether namespaces also have URIs, and if so, whether those URIs (represented as strings) are equal to their names. I tried to argue for the position that the best URI for a namespace was "data:,<namespaceName>" but nobody bought it at the time, and in hindsight I think that was wise. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all. There are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful. --_The Hobbit_
Received on Sunday, 17 February 2002 19:46:26 UTC