- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:33:42 +0000
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "'TAG'" <www-tag@w3.org>
At 01:20 AM 2/19/02 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >I'm not sure my being convinced or not matters, so long as you're in the >business of making sure there's a level of indirection between namespace >URI and schema XYZ. Lose that level, and I'll argue quite strongly. Noting some points from DanC's argument, I'd soften this to allowing that indirection is possible, but not always required. Then, for cases where simple content negotiation is sufficient, the indirection can be avoided. #g ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 06:56:30 UTC