- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:52:29 -0500
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "TAG" <www-tag@w3.org>
>
> The issue is how many extensions to put into RDDL 2 (or whatever it will
be
> called) ? I am not opposed to #1 if there are no objections.
>
Shame on me for sending out an email before my morning cofee... The problem
with setting the source of the link using something like rddl:about is that
such an attribute would be outside of XLink.
The source of the arc created by a rddl:resource is determined by Xlink.
A point to be clarified:
<rddl:resource
xml:base=http://example.org/source
xlink:role=http://example.org/simpleLink
xlink:arcrole=http://example.org/foo
xlink:href=http://example.org/target
>...
The xml:base would be useful if the xlink:href were a relative URI in order
to determine the target URI. Is the source URI of this arc
http://example.org/source or is it the "mid:" URI of this email?
Jonathan
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 08:26:49 UTC