- From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 23:35:17 -0500
- To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>
- Cc: "TAG" <www-tag@w3.org>, <fallside@us.ibm.com>
Have you brought up this issue with the XML Protocol WG which is responsible for the SOAP 1.2 specification? If not then why are you bringing this to the TAG first? If you have brought it up with the responsible WG then I think it is appropriate that you provide the TAG with pointers to the issue, its discussion and resolution so that the TAG does not have to do this research itself. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 <mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@prescod.net] > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:03 PM > To: TAG > Subject: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs > > I would like to raise the issue of what is the appropriate relationship > between SOAP RPC and the web's reliance on URIs. In particular, what are > best practices for putting information in SOAP RPC parameters versus in > the endpoint URI. If the TAG considers it important I would like to have > a canonical answer that could be added to the SOAP specification. > > Paul Prescod
Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 23:36:09 UTC