- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: 19 Feb 2002 10:45:28 -0500
- To: TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 09:02, Paul Prescod wrote: > I think I understand from the IRC logs that the idea is that the world > of XML documents will be divided into two sets, those where the > top-level namespace allows dispatching and those where it does not. The > latter documents must not be shipped with a +xml suffix. If the latter is the case, that's an enormously creative reinterpretation of RFC 3023 that I don't find plausible. +xml indicates that the document is XML, per XML 1.0. It makes no requirements whatsoever of particular namespace usage, nor do I believe it should. If someone wants to make this argument, they should bring it up on ietf-xml-mime@imc.org. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 09:41:21 UTC