- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: 19 Feb 2002 14:58:55 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 13:14, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Implementation of conneg in browsers is generally woeful; that > doesn't mean that conneg is useless in other situations (such as a > machine negotiating what representation it wants). I'm (definitely) not saying that content-negotiation is a bad idea. I'm just saying that it isn't transparent enough presently to be a good idea for namespace documents. The step-by-step instructions for setting up a namespace document would be a substantial read in their own right. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 13:54:51 UTC