- From: Bill de hÓra <bdehora@interx.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:33:19 -0000
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
> > Tim: > > To do anything else leads, as far as I can see, to total chaos. The > > supreme court will have to sit every time we need to figure out > > whether it is an SVG, XSLT, or Conditional document. > >Simon: > I see no chaos, and no need to impose the order you seem > inclined to impose. The supreme court needn't figure out > whether documents are "SVG, XSLT, or Conditional". Programs > can do their best to determine such things, or humans can do > their best to help them. > zzzzzzzzz > Adding a file extension of ".xsl" to documents meant to be > XSLT and ".svg" to documents meant to be SVG is a very simple > way to deal with these cases and make them amenable to > automated processing. (If you don't like the notion of file > extensions, assigning MIME Media Types will do as well, and > are likely driven off the extensions anyway.) This article about how recent Mac OSes handle file types and file meta-data (and the consequences of such) is worth reading: <http://arstechnica.com/reviews/01q3/metadata/metadata-1.html> regards, Bill de hÓra
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 09:38:33 UTC