- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: 19 Feb 2002 01:20:21 -0500
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: "'TAG'" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 23:40, Tim Bray wrote: > >I don't mind reserving the term 'schema' to mean > >something syntactic in TAG use, if that's really > >the way it's used in the wild. I just wonder > >if that's the way it's used in the wild. > > As often as not, I'd say. Simon's not convinced. Anyone have > any more evidence? -Tim I'm not sure my being convinced or not matters, so long as you're in the business of making sure there's a level of indirection between namespace URI and schema XYZ. Lose that level, and I'll argue quite strongly. I just want to make sure that informal descriptions (and random code) are recognized as useful information, potentially even schemas of a sort, and that any system of namespace documents doesn't give 'validating schemas' particular privilege over these. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 00:15:47 UTC