W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2002

RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2

From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: 19 Feb 2002 01:20:21 -0500
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: "'TAG'" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1014099622.947.328.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 23:40, Tim Bray wrote:
> >I don't mind reserving the term 'schema' to mean
> >something syntactic in TAG use, if that's really
> >the way it's used in the wild. I just wonder
> >if that's the way it's used in the wild.
> As often as not, I'd say.  Simon's not convinced.  Anyone have 
> any more evidence?  -Tim

I'm not sure my being convinced or not matters, so long as you're in the
business of making sure there's a level of indirection between namespace
URI and schema XYZ.  Lose that level, and I'll argue quite strongly.

I just want to make sure that informal descriptions (and random code)
are recognized as useful information, potentially even schemas of a
sort, and that any system of namespace documents doesn't give
'validating schemas' particular privilege over these.

Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 00:15:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:49 UTC