W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2002

www-tag@w3.org from February 2002 by author

Art.Barstow@nokia.com
- RE: Issue request for the TAG: XForms (Monday, 4 February)
Bill de hÓra
- RE: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Monday, 4 February)
Brian McBride
- Issue for the tag? (Friday, 15 February)
Chris Lilley
- Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be enco uraged...) (Sunday, 24 February)
Dan Connolly
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Monday, 18 February)
- PROPFIND disconnected from GET space? [whenToUseGet-7] (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
- "charset" is not generic to all media types [nsMediaType-3] (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Slight architectural discrepancy between XMl 1.0 & the infoset (Saturday, 2 February)
Daniel Dardailler
- Issue for the TAG (Thursday, 14 February)
David Fallside
- RE: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Tuesday, 12 February)
David Orchard
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Monday, 18 February)
- Draft TAG response to as yet unnumbered Rick Jelliffe issue (Wednesday, 13 February)
- RE: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
- RE: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure (Wednesday, 13 February)
Fisher Mark
- RE: Minutes from 4 Feb 2002 TAG teleconference (Thursday, 28 February)
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: New Issue request for TAG: Where does XML fit into the Web Architecture (Wednesday, 13 February)
George Lund
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
Graham Klyne
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- New question: distinguished status of http:? (Tuesday, 19 February)
- [uriMediaType-9] Re: Minutes from 4 Feb 2002 TAG teleconference (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: "charset" is not generic to all media types [nsMediaType-3] (Monday, 4 February)
Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: Crossposting: was Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
- Minutes from 4 Feb 2002 TAG teleconference (Monday, 11 February)
- [uriMediaType-9] Why does the Web use mime types and not URIs? (Tuesday, 5 February)
- [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like? (Tuesday, 5 February)
Ian Graham
- Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Thursday, 21 February)
Jacek Kopecky
- RE: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
- RE: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
Jason Diamond
- Re: Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) (Wednesday, 6 February)
John Cowan
- Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
Jonathan Borden
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: Interpretation of XML documents with mixed namespaces [mixedNamespaceMeaning-13] (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
- [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
- [namespaceDocument-8] Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: Possible Architectural issue with XHTML modularization? (Monday, 18 February)
- Root Namespaces, 'document types' and XPaths (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
Joseph Reagle
- Re: "canonical" URIs (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Request for Guidance on XML Encryption changing MedaTypes (Saturday, 16 February)
Julian Reschke
- RE: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)
Jun Fujisawa
- Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 16 February)
Larry Masinter
- RE: Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (Wednesday, 6 February)
Mark Baker
- Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: PROPFIND disconnected from GET space? [whenToUseGet-7] (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)
Mark Nottingham
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: Eastlake on Mime/URI (Monday, 11 February)
Martin Duerst
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
Masayasu Ishikawa
- Re: Possible Architectural issue with XHTML modularization? (Monday, 18 February)
Micah Dubinko
- RE: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 25 February)
- RE: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
MURATA Makoto
- Re: customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Friday, 1 February)
ned.freed@mrochek.com
- Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
Norman Walsh
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: Slight architectural discrepancy between XMl 1.0 & the infoset (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Packaging (was namespaces and MIME types) (Wednesday, 6 February)
Patrick Stickler
- Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
- [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) (Wednesday, 6 February)
Paul Cotton
- RE: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure (Wednesday, 13 February)
- RE: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure (Wednesday, 13 February)
- RE: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Tuesday, 12 February)
- RE: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Saturday, 9 February)
- RE: Request for Architects [slightly off topic] (Friday, 8 February)
Paul Grosso
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
- RE: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
Paul Prescod
- Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 25 February)
- QUERY (was re: PROPFIND) (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be enco uraged...) (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
- Intepretation: whenToUseGet-7 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Namespace dispatching (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
- Namespace and URIs (Sunday, 17 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: Eastlake on Mime/URI (Monday, 11 February)
- Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Saturday, 9 February)
- Re: Packaging (was namespaces and MIME types) (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Monday, 4 February)
Piotr Kaminski
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Sunday, 24 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
- Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Friday, 8 February)
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 14 February)
- New Issue request for TAG: Where does XML fit into the Web Architecture (Tuesday, 12 February)
Sean B. Palmer
- [uriMediaType-9] Identifying Content Classes in HTTP Using rdf:type (Saturday, 9 February)
Simon St.Laurent
- updated xmlns media feature (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Tuesday, 19 February)
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: Packaging (was namespaces and MIME types) (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Monday, 4 February)
Tim Berners-Lee
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF (Thursday, 28 February)
- Interpretation of XML documents with mixed namespaces [mixedNamespaceMeaning-13] (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: Intepretation: whenToUseGet-7 (Tuesday, 26 February)
- Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Friday, 22 February)
- PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Saturday, 2 February)
- Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Saturday, 2 February)
- Re: Resource discovery: limits of URIs (Friday, 1 February)
Tim Bray
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
- [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Monday, 18 February)
- Possible Architectural issue with XHTML modularization? (Monday, 18 February)
- [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses (Monday, 18 February)
- Crossposting: was Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
- Re: customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? (Thursday, 14 February)
- Eastlake on Mime/URI (Monday, 11 February)
- Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
- XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
- Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like? (Tuesday, 5 February)
- customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)
- Slight architectural discrepancy between XMl 1.0 & the infoset (Friday, 1 February)
Williams, Stuart
- [uriMediaType-9]: Draft Finding from 12th February F2F Meeting (Monday, 18 February)