- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:18:07 -0500
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
At 8:43 PM -0800 2/6/02, Tim Bray wrote: >to XML-SW, aside from the difficult question of what goes in ><?xml version="?", should in all respects conform to all the W3C >recommendations that went into it. > I'm still reading through, but if this actually works as a pure subset of XML 1.0, then we could keep version="1.0" and use a processing instruction in the prolog to identify it as an XML-SW document. It would be very nice if existing XML parsers could handle XML-SW documents without updates. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 07:32:54 UTC