Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment from MURATA Makoto on 2002-02-14 (www-tag@w3.org from February 2002)

From: MURATA Makoto <mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:13:10 +0900 (JST)
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020214.111310.60851681.mmurata@trl.ibm.com>

I like this draft.

Here is a list of the relevant errata for the second edition
(http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-2e-errata).

E5
E11
E12
E13
the last change of E15
E17
E22
E23
E24
E26 (for the xml:base attribute)
E27
E28

While preparing a Japanese translation of XML2e, I sent many comments
to the xml-editor mailing list.  Two of them are relevant.

-  Now that ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001 has been published, XML 1.0 should
   reference to it.

-  "whose canonical (UCS-4) code value" is misleading.
   One could argue that the UCS-4 code value after character
   normalization is mentioned.

--
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 21:18:40 UTC