review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
Interested in seeing your material
Validation of XHTML documents containing RDF metadata
URIs for user-defined datatypes for use in OWL
Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema
Syntax: please add N-Triples to the examples
rdf:nodeID and external entities?
- Re: rdf:nodeID and external entities?
- RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities?
- RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities?
- RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities?
- RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities?
- Re: rdf:nodeID and external entities?
- RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities?
Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
- Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping]
Seeking normative definition of datatyping
problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
- Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
questions about syntax document and n-triples
XPointer
Resume computer information systems CA CO http://hometown.aol.com/gmasley
comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/)
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
- Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
RDF datatyping
updated validator?
Confusion about Collections
- Re: Confusion about Collections
Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
- Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)
Re: ERD for library system
Description of rdfs:isDefinedBy in RDF Schema WD
Vocabulary / Semantics
RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
RDF MT: rdfs interpretations of subClassOf and subPropertyOf
reification in RDF
Errors in RDF Test Cases of 12 Nov 2002(?)
Re: Comments on abstract syntax
Re: Comments on the new RDF Concepts and ADM Draft
Re: Comments on RDF: Concepts and Abstract Data Model
Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: semantics
XML literals in RDF/XML Syntax Specification (8 Nov 2002)
Comment on RDF/XML Syntax Spec Revised Dated 8 Nov 2002
Comment on RDF Schema 1.0 dated 12 Nov. 2002
Misspelling Massimo Marchiori
Regarding new working drafts
MTP――管理人员培训
Re: RDF and mixed content
Re: RDF in XHTML
Re: RDF Test Cases WD for review
comments on RDF MT
- Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)
- Re: comments on RDF MT
- Re: comments on RDF MT
- Re: comments on RDF MT
comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document
- Re: comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document
- Re: comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document
Notes on RDF/XML Syntax Spec (WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20020325)
comment on emptyPropertyElt
a question on RDF-MT
RDF Model and Syntax Specification
rdf:Property X rdfs:Property
single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?]
- Re: single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?]
- Re: single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?]
RDF should allow XML datatypes
- Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes
- Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes
- Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes
defining RDF graph syntax
Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
The first sentence
Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
- Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
- Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
- Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft)
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic web?
Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc
- Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc