Re: single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?]

>>>"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" said:
> I was guilty of looking at the WD not the editor's copy, so my comments are
> not accurate.

No problem.

> That said, I still think that the text is very hard to comprehend.
> Something like:
> 
> 	A name can be used at most once as the value of an rdf:ID or
> 	rdf:bagID ...
> 
> would be much better.  Also, referring to the negative test case would
> be better than referring to a positive test case.

Thanks for these suggestions, I'll change it to be something like that.

Dave

Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 07:08:04 UTC