- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:11:59 -0500 (EST)
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:01:01 +0000 > At 10:55 28/11/2002 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > >It appears to me that the use of rdf:nodeID makes it impossible to > >correctly transform an RDF/XML document into n-triples without first > >checking for all the rdf:nodeID uses in the document. Otherwise a > >generated blank node id could accidentally be the same as one used (later) > >in an rdf:nodeID in the document. > > Is there anywhere in the spec where it says that the node id used in the > n-triples MUST be the same as the nodeID used in the rdf/xml? > > Brian As indicated in my response to Jan, I believe that the spec explicitly requires that the node id in the triple is the same as in the RDF/XML. peter
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2002 12:13:25 UTC