W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:11:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20021128.121159.63238952.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:01:01 +0000

> At 10:55 28/11/2002 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> >It appears to me that the use of rdf:nodeID makes it impossible to
> >correctly transform an RDF/XML document into n-triples without first
> >checking for all the rdf:nodeID uses in the document.  Otherwise a
> >generated blank node id could accidentally be the same as one used (later)
> >in an rdf:nodeID in the document.
> Is there anywhere in the spec where it says that the node id used in the 
> n-triples MUST be the same as the nodeID used in the rdf/xml?
> Brian

As indicated in my response to Jan, I believe that the spec explicitly
requires that the node id in the triple is the same as in the RDF/XML.

Received on Thursday, 28 November 2002 12:13:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:19 UTC