- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 12:26:23 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
>>>"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" said: > 1/ In several places the syntax document says to generate a blank node > identifier. However, I can find no method for doing so. Also I do not see > any requirement that the generated identifier needs to be fresh. I'll expand this in the next draft on the detail of this generation in the next draft. Fresh: yes. The operation is to generate a new graph-local identifier that can be distinguished from any other. There are two syntaxes involved here that serialize such identifiers (N-Triples and RDf/XML), and they have restrictions on the syntax used - sequences of characters. This does not apply to the blank node identifier in the graph, just in the serialization. I hope the RDF Concepts draft explains how blank node identifiers are used in syntaxes, even though they are not used explicitly in the graph itself. The syntax WD points at [[a blank node identifier, which is a local identifier that can be distinguished from all URIs and literals. When graphs are merged, their blank nodes must be kept distinct if meaning is to be preserved; this may call for re-allocation of blank node identifiers.]] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#dfn-blank-node-id If this is not sufficient, let us know. > 2/ The n-triples spec requires that nodeIDs in triples be formed from > names, which goes against the common (in WebOnt) practice of using _:1 as a > nodeID. That's always been both illegal N-Triples and N3. N-Triples [[ nodeID ::= '_:' name name ::= [A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9]* ]] -- http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#nodeID N3: [[ qname := prefix : localname prefix := alpha prefix alphanumeric _ (special ntuples hack. Everything in _ namespace is implictly existentially qualified at the outermost scope) localname := alpha localname alphanumeric alpha := any letter a-z or A-Z case sensitive alphanumeric := alpha any digit 0-9 _ (the underscore) ]] -- http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.html#localname One reason is it is meant to look like an XML QName formed of a namespace prefix (_, here meaning blank node) and a local name. XML local names are not allowed to start with numbers. It is in particular confusing when written in N3 with the (legal) :_1 which could be used when with @prefix : <rdf namespace> standing in for rdf:_1 Dave
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 07:28:14 UTC