Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) from Arjohn Kampman on 2002-11-12 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from October to December 2002)

From: Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@castel.nl>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:08:19 +0100
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <3DD0C503.3020209@castel.nl>

pat hayes wrote:
[...]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0003.html
>> and it's follow-ups.
> 
> 
> However, the MT does not, and will not, have the 'uml'-style restriction 
> on subclasses of meta-classes asked for in the above message. The rule 
> 'rdfs 11' proposed there is not RDFS-valid.

Sure. I was only refering to the reflexivity rules for classes and
properties:

xxx rdf:type rdfs:Class --> xxx rdfs:subClassOf xxx
xxx rdf:type rdf:Property --> xxx rdfs:subPropertyOf xxx

Cheers,

Arjohn

Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2002 04:16:58 UTC