Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)

pat hayes wrote:
>> and it's follow-ups.
> However, the MT does not, and will not, have the 'uml'-style restriction 
> on subclasses of meta-classes asked for in the above message. The rule 
> 'rdfs 11' proposed there is not RDFS-valid.

Sure. I was only refering to the reflexivity rules for classes and

xxx rdf:type rdfs:Class --> xxx rdfs:subClassOf xxx
xxx rdf:type rdf:Property --> xxx rdfs:subPropertyOf xxx



Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2002 04:16:58 UTC