- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:53:42 +0100
- To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "www-rdf-comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
>> > Does this mean that if I represent a graph in rdf/xml inside an html >> > document by putting some triples inside rdf tags it has a completely >> > different meaning to a graph expressed in exactly the same way but >> served as >> > an .rdf document? > >I said somthing like that once and Graham Klyne pointed out my error to me. > >If I have some HTML containing say: > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something#foo"> > ... > >The issue here is about what http://example.org/something#foo names. The >meaning of this is not dependent on the mimetype of the referring >document, >e.g. text/html, but on the mime-type of the *retrieved* document. The RDF >specs are saying that for determining the RDF meaning of this >uriref, it is >the meaning that would be assigned by retrieving a document of mime-type >application/rdf+xml. > >Embedding in a document of mime-type text/html does not affect this. Sorry Brian, I'm a little confused, could you just please clarify - irrespective of the mime-type of the document containing <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something#foo"> the interpretation of http://example.org/something#foo here will be the (opaque) RDF interpretation if the mime-type of http://example.org/something is application/rdf+xml, but if the mime-type of http://example.org/something was text/html then this would likely be interpreted as an element <a name="foo"> in http://example.org/something ok so far? now looking at this from an application's perspective, let's say we know that http://example.org/something#foo is retrievable. So we GET it, if the mime-type returned is application/rdf+xml then the application (somewhere just after the parser) would be looking at the resource #foo in the target doc, if the mime-type was text/html it would be looking at the anchor #foo. How's that? Or have I totally misunderstood? (again). A related (slightly Trojan) question : Assuming the kind of setup above with application/rdf+xml, what is the relationship *in the graph* between <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something"> and <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something#foo"> Cheers, Danny.
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 09:04:46 UTC