- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:13:23 -0600
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
<snip> > > Yes, Patrick. This has been very helpful. I appreciate your > clarification. > > > > Shelley > > > > P.S. Is this same discussion in the documents, and did I just miss it? > > It's here and there. Though it probably could be made more explicit. > > Have a look at the Primer draft, section 5.2 > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#properties > > and the RDF Vocabulary Description Language (RDF Schema) draft, the > section titled "rdfs:range" (no section numbers in that draft yet, > unfortunately) > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_range > > Though, yes, the relationship between rdfs:range and rdfs:Datatype's > could be made more explicit in the primer. I see that Frank has a note > there to add more about this, so hopefully we'll see this eventually. > > Cheers, > > Patrick Thanks for additional clarification from both you and Frank on this and other items, such as containers and collections. One result of the discussion in the last few days is I'm dropping my chapter originally titled "Reification: The RDF Big Ugly". I'm now writing one titled "The Semantically Challenged: Reification, Containers, Collections" Heh. Thanks again! Shelley
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 14:14:44 UTC