www-rdf-comments@w3.org from October to December 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)

Arjohn Kampman

• Re: Errors in RDF Test Cases of 12 Nov 2002(?) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Errors in RDF Test Cases of 12 Nov 2002(?) (Tuesday, 19 November)
• XML literals in RDF/XML Syntax Specification (8 Nov 2002) (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) (Monday, 11 November)
• Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) (Monday, 11 November)

Art.Barstow@nokia.com

• Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema (Thursday, 12 December)
• Syntax: please add N-Triples to the examples (Thursday, 12 December)
• RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Tuesday, 3 December)
• RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Tuesday, 3 December)
• questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Monday, 2 December)
• Seeking normative definition of datatyping (Monday, 2 December)

Bill de hÓra

• Re: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)

Bob DuCharme

• Notes on RDF/XML Syntax Spec (WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20020325) (Sunday, 3 November)

Brian McBride

• RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Comment on RDF Schema 1.0 dated 12 Nov. 2002 (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/) (Wednesday, 4 December)
• RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Tuesday, 3 December)
• RE: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Seeking normative definition of datatyping (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Wednesday, 27 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Monday, 25 November)
• SChema TODO: Re: Description of rdfs:isDefinedBy in RDF Schema WD (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Vocabulary / Semantics (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: Regarding new working drafts (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Regarding new working drafts (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Regarding new working drafts (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: rdf:Property X rdfs:Property (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: RDF Issue rdfs-domain-unconstrained (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Monotony (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: rdf:nodeID addresses rdfms-syntax-incomplete (Sunday, 13 October)
• Re: RDF typed node implementation experience (Thursday, 10 October)

Bullard, Claude L (Len)

• RE: [xml-dev] Semantic web? (Wednesday, 23 October)
• RE: [xml-dev] Semantic web? (Wednesday, 23 October)

Chris Catton

• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Saturday, 23 November)

Dan Brickley

• Re: reification in RDF (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: reification in RDF (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc (Tuesday, 22 October)
• feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: parseType=collection causing confusion (fwd) (Saturday, 5 October)

Dan Connolly

• URIs for user-defined datatypes for use in OWL (Thursday, 19 December)
• single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?] (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc (Tuesday, 22 October)
• rdf:nodeID addresses rdfms-syntax-incomplete (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: An implementation of proposal F (Friday, 11 October)

Daniel \

• unqualified RDF attributes in schema and syntax documents (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: RDF Issue rdfs-domain-unconstrained (Tuesday, 15 October)

Daniel Krech

• Re: RDF Test Cases WD for review (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Monday, 28 October)

Danny Ayers

• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Wednesday, 27 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Wednesday, 27 November)
• RE: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] Semantic web? (Wednesday, 23 October)

Dave Beckett

• Re: rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Syntax: please add N-Triples to the examples (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Syntax: please add N-Triples to the examples (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: questions about syntax document and n-triples (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: XPointer (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: XPointer (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: updated validator? (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: XML literals in RDF/XML Syntax Specification (8 Nov 2002) (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Comment on RDF/XML Syntax Spec Revised Dated 8 Nov 2002 (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: RDF in XHTML (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Notes on RDF/XML Syntax Spec (WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20020325) (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: comment on emptyPropertyElt (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?] (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?] (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc (Wednesday, 23 October)

Frank Manola

• Re: Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: reification in RDF (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: Monotony (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Monotony (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: Monotony (Thursday, 10 October)

Galiton

• �����һ����ǵ����� (Monday, 7 October)
• �����һ����ǵ����� (Monday, 7 October)

Graham Klyne

• Re: XPointer (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Wednesday, 27 November)
• RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Entailment (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RDF for working programmers? (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: feedback on rdfcore syntax changes: pls allow unqualified about=, etc (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts and formal inference paths ? (Sunday, 20 October)

Greg Masley

• Resume computer information systems CA CO http://hometown.aol.com/gmasley (Tuesday, 26 November)

herman.ter.horst@philips.com

• Re: comments on RDF MT (Tuesday, 12 November)
• comments on RDF MT (Friday, 8 November)

Jan Grant

• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Errors in RDF Test Cases of 12 Nov 2002(?) (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: rdf:nodeID addresses rdfms-syntax-incomplete (Friday, 11 October)

Janne Saarela

• Re: An implementation of proposal F (Saturday, 12 October)
• Re: RDF typed node implementation experience (Friday, 11 October)
• RDF typed node implementation experience (Thursday, 10 October)

Jeen Broekstra

• Re: RDF MT: rdfs interpretations of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (Friday, 22 November)
• RDF MT: rdfs interpretations of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document (Friday, 8 November)

Jeremy Carroll

• RDF datatyping (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Comments on abstract syntax (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: RDF and mixed content (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF: Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on the new RDF Concepts and ADM Draft (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: semantics (Monday, 18 November)

Jim Hendler

• Re: comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document (Friday, 8 November)

John Montgomery

• Interested in seeing your material (Tuesday, 24 December)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RDF should allow XML datatypes (Tuesday, 29 October)

Joshua Allen

• RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Monday, 16 December)
• RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Sunday, 15 December)
• RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Saturday, 14 December)
• RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Thursday, 12 December)
• rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Wednesday, 11 December)

M abdo

• Re: ERD for library system (Saturday, 23 November)

m batsis

• Re: Syntax and Primer: URI for XML Schema (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Comment on RDF Schema 1.0 dated 12 Nov. 2002 (Monday, 18 November)

Martin Dvorak

• rdf:Property X rdfs:Property (Wednesday, 30 October)

MDaconta@aol.com

• Comment on RDF/XML Syntax Spec Revised Dated 8 Nov 2002 (Monday, 18 November)
• Comment on RDF Schema 1.0 dated 12 Nov. 2002 (Sunday, 17 November)

Monika Schuth

• RDF Model and Syntax Specification (Thursday, 31 October)

MURATA Makoto

• Validation of XHTML documents containing RDF metadata (Monday, 23 December)

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

• Re: Validation of XHTML documents containing RDF metadata (Monday, 23 December)

pat hayes

• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/) (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/) (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/) (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Tuesday, 3 December)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Vocabulary / Semantics (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: RDF MT: rdfs interpretations of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: RDF in XHTML (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: comments on RDF MT (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: comments on RDF MT (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts and formal inference paths ? (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Monotony (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Monotony (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Monotony (Friday, 11 October)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: RDF should allow XML datatypes (Wednesday, 30 October)

Paul Prescod

• Re: RDF and mixed content (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: RDF and mixed content (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: RDF in XHTML (Wednesday, 13 November)

Pete Johnston

• Description of rdfs:isDefinedBy in RDF Schema WD (Friday, 22 November)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 31 December)
• review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• problem with blank node identifiers and rdf:nodeID (Thursday, 28 November)
• questions about syntax document and n-triples (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document (Friday, 8 November)
• comments on current (6 Nov) draft of RDF MT document (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: comment on emptyPropertyElt (Friday, 1 November)
• comment on emptyPropertyElt (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: single-ID constraint not clear [Fwd: Re: Guide: Legal syntax?] (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Sunday, 27 October)
• Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Thursday, 24 October)

Richard H. McCullough

• Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/) (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/) (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: context (comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/) (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Wednesday, 27 November)
• comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Tuesday, 26 November)

Roland Schwaenzl

• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: questions about rdfs:Datatype [Was: RE: Seeking normative definition of datatyping] (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: XPointer (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: XPointer (Thursday, 28 November)
• XPointer (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• Vocabulary / Semantics (Wednesday, 20 November)

Sandro Hawke

• Misspelling Massimo Marchiori (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Thursday, 24 October)
• Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Thursday, 24 October)

Seth Russell

• Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions) (Saturday, 23 November)
• reification in RDF (Tuesday, 19 November)
• defining RDF graph syntax (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• #ThisGraph (Sunday, 27 October)
• Re: Meaning of URIRefs (new test case, comments on Concepts draft) (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: [xml-dev] Semantic web? (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts and formal inference paths ? (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Monotony (Friday, 18 October)
• RDF Concepts and formal inference paths ? (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: Monotony (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Monotony (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: RDF typed node implementation experience (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: Monotony (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: Monotony (Thursday, 10 October)
• Monotony (Thursday, 10 October)

Shelley Powers

• RE: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Datatype (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• Datatype was RE: Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• updated validator? (Monday, 25 November)
• Confusion about Collections (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: Regarding new working drafts (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Regarding new working drafts (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Regarding new working drafts (Thursday, 14 November)
• Regarding new working drafts (Thursday, 14 November)

Vlad SIMIONESCU

• range, domain and sub-property hierarchies (Tuesday, 8 October)

zhang lei

• a question on RDF-MT (Thursday, 31 October)

zuoying@digitalchina.com

• MTP――管理人员培训 (Thursday, 14 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 2002 12:49:04 UTC